Conventional Wind Energy – A Design Deadly for Birds
A 2013 study published in The Wildlife Society Bulletin found that wind turbines killed an estimated 573,000 birds annually in the United States. And that figure was almost 7 years ago. According to U.S. Wind Energy State Facts ( Oct. 2016), there are over 52,000 wind turbines installed across 40 U.S. States plus Puerto Rico & Guam.
Most people do not realize how little energy is actually derived from these wind turbines. For calendar year 2016, Wikipedia states that wind power in the United States amounted to only 5.55% of generated electrical energy. The goal is to have these turbines produce 20% of generated electrical energy in the U.S. by 2030—and one can only imagine how many more turbines would have to be built with an incalculable risk to birds.
An even more alarming fact is that the data on the number of deaths is gathered by paid consultants to the wind industry. That’s the fox guarding the chicken house. At the infamous Altamont Wind Resource Area alone, more than 2,000 Golden Eagles have been killed by the wind turbines there.
Since the diet of Bald Eagles is primarily fish, when wind turbine developers begin constructing wind farms on our coasts or near lakes or rivers, the mortality rate for Bald Eagles will skyrocket. We cannot let this happen.
The size of each traditionally designed industrial wind turbine is staggering. An average tower is 212 feet (but can go well over that), with arms 116 feet long – that’s an enormous area that is covered as the blades rotate.
During construction of a wind turbine, roads often have to be widened or built from scratch; mountain tops are sometimes blasted away to create a level area of at least 3 acres, so that the platform can be stable enough to support the enormous weight of each turbine assembly.
“Wind turbines may now be among the fastest-growing human-caused threats to our nation’s birds. Attempts to manage the wind industry with voluntary as opposed to mandatory permitting guidelines are clearly not working. Wind developers are siting turbines in areas of vital importance to birds and other wildlife, and this new data shows that the current voluntary system needs radical improvement”, said Dr. Michael Hutchins (now deceased), former National Coordinator of American Bird Conservancy’s Bird Smart Wind Energy Campaign.
The American Eagle Foundation joins American Bird Conservancy in supporting Bird Smart wind energy development, which involves careful risk assessment leading to appropriate siting; independent, standardized post-construction monitoring of bird fatalities; mitigation using effective, tested methods; and compensation if federally protected birds and bats are killed incidentally. The number of birds taken annually by wind energy facilities (not including associated power lines and towers) has been estimated to exceed 1.4 million birds by 2030 if there is no change in U.S. policy toward wind energy development.
Fish & Wildlife Service’s Eagle Management Plan Presents Grave Risk
In December, 2016, a new eagle-management plan announced a final rule by the federal government that would give wind energy developers 30-year permits to “take” or incidentally kill protected Bald and Golden Eagles, without requiring the industry to share mortality data with the public or take into consideration such critical factors as proper siting. The so-called Eagle Take Rule, finalized by the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, puts many thousands of the nation’s protected Bald and Golden Eagles at unacceptable risk.
The American Bird Conservancy – as well as a host of other environmental agencies – have requested that the U.S. Department of the Interior develop a National Programmatic Wind Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to identify appropriate areas for wind energy development as well as areas where development should be avoided completely to conserve federally protected birds and protect especially sensitive habitats.
ABC was subsequently told that the Department of the Interior and FWS did not have sufficient funds to undertake such a project.
Supporting the development of clean, renewable sources of energy such as wind and solar power to address climate change is admirable, but such development must be done responsibly, with minimal impact on our public trust resources, especially federally protected species such as Bald Eagles and Golden Eagles. If wind farms are to be created, we must make sure the farms are placed in areas where there will be the least negative impact to eagles and other birds.
Ten Worst Offenders
ABC has identified 10 of the worst-sited wind energy projects in the United States. The listed projects—five already built or approved and five proposed—are located throughout the United States, in California, Hawaii, Kansas, Massachusetts, Missouri, New York, North Dakota, Texas, West Virginia, and Wyoming. Some of these projects have a long history of causing bird deaths. All illustrate the risks of poor siting and the limitations of current mitigation strategies.
Are Some Designs Better Than Others? Look to Hawai’i’s Approach!
In June 2016, an article by Dr. Hutchins entitled To Protect Birds From Wind Turbines, Look to Hawai’i’s Approach stated, “To address the growing and recognized risk to threatened and endangered species, federal and state regulators have created protections that are currently unique to Hawai‘i. While far from perfect, we believe these protocols should, at minimum, also be employed on the mainland. Doing so would go a long way toward helping protect threatened and endangered birds and bats.”
In Hawai’i some areas are completely off limits to wind development. State and federal officials have declared the island of Kaua‘i totally restricted for any wind energy development due to the presence of many endangered species. This forethought and planning have been lacking on the mainland.
Of Particular Concern
Again, Bald Eagles will be seriously impacted when wind turbines are placed around the Great Lakes or other major waterways, because fish is their main source of food.
In July 2016, a radar study was released by the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service that confirms wind turbines on the Great Lakes pose an unacceptably high risk to migratory birds and other wildlife. Proposed projects in New York, including the Lighthouse Wind facility, raises a red flag of alarm, as reported in a press release by American Bird Conservancy, Wind Turbines On The Great Lakes Threaten Migratory Birds.
This concern is echoed by the Rochester Birding Association in New York, stating that “due to its siting within 5 miles of the lakefront, [this project] will cause significant risk to migrating birds. Up to 71 turbines are planned along the south shore of Lake Ontario, and these turbines are 570 to 620 feet tall. That is twice the normal height!
The Fish & Wildlife Service currently recommends that wind turbines should not be placed any closer than 3 miles of the Great Lakes shorelines; the American Bird Conservancy recommends 5 miles. However, the recent FWS radar study indicates that the minimum should be extended to perhaps 10 miles from the shoreline.
This study monitored four sites using radar along the shore of Lake Ontario, scanning 24 hours a day in vertical and horizontal planes to capture movement. At all sites, the radar recorded high levels of bird and bat activity in or near the “rotor-swept zone” that wind turbines would occupy if built along the lakeshore. Activity was especially high at night. Hutchins stated, “It confirms what we have long known: In the absence of proven methods to reduce bird collisions with turbines, wind-energy development must be sited in areas where there are fewer birds and bats to minimize harm to these ecologically important animals.”
Into the Future
Can wind energy ever be bird safe? Libby Sander of the American Bird Conservancy, in an article dated Jan. 5, 2017 discusses this topic. New designs advertise they are “safe for wildlife.” The technology comes in all sizes, shapes, and appearances. They all say they can harness the power of wind and create energy without killing birds. In one, giant sails funnel wind through a central turbine; in another design, wind is funneled into a tube, increasing speed. There is a definite need for innovation, but rigorous scientific empirical evidence over the long haul is needed to authenticate the claims of any new design.
A startup in Spain called Vortex, however, has recently come up with a new design for the turbines. More Information.
The bladeless turbines are massive poles jutting out of the ground. Because they’re thinner than a regular wind turbine and have no blades, more of them can fit into a space, meaning more electricity can be generated while taking up less real estate.
This video (from 2015) is in both Spanish and English – first there is a Spanish section, then English…
Al Cecere, former President & Founder of the American Eagle Foundation states:
If you are aware of a future wind turbine development, garner support from your community, region, and state. Wind turbines affect birds of prey, but they also implicate other non-environmental issues, such as interfering with cellular connection and becoming an eyesore in otherwise beautiful landscapes. There are many reasons for a group of people to want to prevent a wind project in or around a community.
Groups you can support where Wind Turbines are being considered: Rochester Birding Association (remember, AEF eagles that are released from our Hack Towers migrate right into this area!) Find out from them what you can do to help, particularly if you live in the Lake Ontario area.
Wind farms are being proposed in these areas and have been identified by ABC as among the Worst Offenders, with explanations why each has been listed. If you live in any of these areas, get involved!
- LIGHTHOUSE: Location: Niagara County, New York near the town of Somerset (Apex Clean Energy)
- MERRICOURT: Location: McIntosh and Dickey Counties, North Dakota (EDF Renewable Energy)
- NINNESCAH: Location: Pratt County, Kansas (NextEra Energy Resources, LLC)
- ROCK CREEK: Location: Atchison County, Missouri (TradeWind Energy)